At
this moment bean counters in Medway will be going over the Quarterly figures
and will be preparing for the next full budget to be presented in
March.
Today's
cabinet meeting will discuss the direct cut to government grant by the Conservative
Government which, when you cut through the smoke, mirrors and deliberate Tory
obfuscation stands at a budget cut of 3.65%. Taking into account inflation and
most residents can read the runes; our services, already stretched by
increasing costs to Adult and Children's care are going to be stretched to
breaking point.
The
direct government grant however is of course the larger; but not the only,
part of the equation.
Medway
Council is likely (though not confirmed yet) to be rising Council Tax on all residents
by approximately 2% this year. This on the face of it would lead to some
objection, given this tax rise will come in addition to the Pickles Poll Tax of
on average £233 for 14,000 or so people currently receiving a Council Tax
Benefit; and the changes to Universal benefits happening on the same day. This
is going to be a tough year for our poorest residents.
The
interesting point that has, and is rarely looked at, is not just the amount the
Council is cutting from the most vulnerable; and raising via direct revenue on
Council Tax; but also on the threshold to precepts or levies which the council
does not directly control.
Our
Tory MPs are always happy to challenge the Police and Fire precept but are
always very silent when it comes to Parishes.
In
Medway 25,000 residents or so live in areas with Parish Council's; many with
inconsistent transparency, rather poor and inaccessible websites, and press
commentary in recent years of ruling cliques. Many are subject to democracy in
all but name with uncontested elections and co-opting of Councillor’s
widespread. I know however that some have strong and committed representatives who
are genuine community champions, whilst others are used as a staging post for
greater office. There are some great examples and there are - to be fair - some very poor examples; and the inconsistency is stark because of a lack of direct oversight.
Many
of these Councils charge not just a small amount, but sometimes up to 10-20% more on the average Council Tax bill with those in bigger properties paying a
larger amount.
An example Medway Parish precept is below currently represented
by 3 Conservative UA Councillor’s and is in addition to the Medway Council tax.
A -
£190 extra
B -
£223 extra
C - £255
extra
D -
£286 extra
E -
£350 extra
F -
£413 extra
G - £477
extra
H - £572
extra
Many
Medway Councillor’s are rightly concerned about the level of Council Tax and we
will be debating the rise in the coming weeks no doubt. The elephant in the
room though is that of the precept which will see some of Medway’s poor and
middle-income residents paying more depending on whether they live in Rochester
or Hoo.
The precept is not capped which means we could see big increases in light of inflationary pressures and cuts. In addition; the totally opaque nature of our current settlement means Parishes will probably be struggling to understand their total tax base. This makes setting of precepts very tricky.
The precept is not capped which means we could see big increases in light of inflationary pressures and cuts. In addition; the totally opaque nature of our current settlement means Parishes will probably be struggling to understand their total tax base. This makes setting of precepts very tricky.
As
a social democrat you will be unsurprised to note that I in favour of better services and in many
areas a level of tax which support these services well. I am in favour of Councillor’s
supporting their communities and justifying higher tax levels. I do consider it
mildly hubristic for those same Councillor’s to be decrying Labour for high tax
levels when many themselves benefit from the same argument in terms of services
rendered. The fact Parishes get away with the precept is because they top-up and offer additional services.
There is a wider political point here; in that some of the biggest advocates for small government and low tax rates are ironically representatives of areas with bigger government in terms of support for services; and they celebrate it. Food for thought.
There is a wider political point here; in that some of the biggest advocates for small government and low tax rates are ironically representatives of areas with bigger government in terms of support for services; and they celebrate it. Food for thought.
The message for Parishes in Medway though is stark; with costs of living going up parishes need to be aware that increasing
precepts will be scrutinised by your electorates, who like me, share a concern
around the level of transparency and democracy on display in parish structures.


No comments:
Post a Comment