Part of a job of being a credible Member of Parliament is
working with diverse array or organisations, public bodies, resident forums, unions, religious institutions and campaign activists to deliver
for your residents.
Over the last two years I have been doing exactly that.
I
have spoken up for residents in Snodland against inappropriate parking
restrictions and challenged why local Councillors have not been ‘calling in’
planning applications. I have worked on a cross party basis to stop an Asbestos
Transfer Station in Lordswood securing signatures to oppose any site. I have
campaigned alongside Liberal Democrats on the Oaken Wood proposal in Ditton and
have worked with Parish Councillors in the Villages to oppose KCC Tory cuts to
bus services in the villages of Burham, Eccles and Wouldham. I have worked with
mums and dads to keep Sure Starts open in Chatham and Larkfield and have
partnered with the Green Party in London City Hall and Friends Groups to oppose
the London Conservative plans to bulldoze over the Isle of Grain. I have
highlighted issues around the Living Wage, Zero Hours Contracts and Freedom
from Fear working with Trade Unions. I have opposed the Pravda Sheet roll, CCTV
car excess, local taxation waste on big projects; campaigns more akin to the
Tax Payers Alliance. I have worked with Sainsbury’s to fill food banks and I
have campaigned on Prostate Cancer research with charities and lobby groups. I have proposed pay day lender bans and championed proposals like the 'Snow Angels' that will give power for communities to act in poor weather; campaigns clearly in the public interest not the vested interest.
Over
the next two months I have two other large doorstep campaigns in track whose
seeds have been sown already…
Meeting people who don’t agree with you is also part of the
job; I receive regular challenge on twitter from people who are on the opposite
side of the political spectrum. I engage. I never refuse to meet those who I
disagree with; the latest example being the RSPB on Lodge Hill; a meeting which
the Medway Conservatives refused incidentally to hold.
How my opponents choose to act is for them to decide. Publishing private email correspondence sent in obvious error is in my mind against the spirit of fairness. It does not match public expectations of appropriate campaign behaviour and highlights an ill-temperateness.
This Living Wage is not a coalition in the pocket of Union
interests – though for Council purposes they are
aware of those most impacted by low wages and are better spokespeople for those
same people – but more broadly a
coalition with business like Ernst & Young, Aviva, PwC and White & Case.
It is a campaign championed by Boris
Johnson (shock) and Labour Students up and down the country.
It will not come as a surprise from today’s Medway Messenger
that a coalition of Progressive interests is clearly united in its ambition for
a Living Wage for the Medway Towns. The Medway Labour and Liberal Democratic
Groups backed the Living Wage in Council and its clear TUSC and the Green Party
are now very much on board as well. In many other areas the Conservatives have come on board too. Building a consensus is why I have spoken with the Medway People's Forum and respect the work that they do not decry the clothes they wear; it is precisely because they are speaking up for vulnerable people and have an awareness of policy challenges that people should be respected. Whether that is protesting outside conference or speaking in Gun Wharf; it is respect to those who have a belief and will fight for it fairly and within the rules.
Incidentally, the Living Wage coalition is made possible and easier to organise exactly because of an arrogant elite in Gun Wharf that once again has not considered a proposal beyond a quick chat of the ‘old boys network’. A coalition made possible by reaching out to people who may not always agree with you on everything but will stand together on a key campaign.
Incidentally, the Living Wage coalition is made possible and easier to organise exactly because of an arrogant elite in Gun Wharf that once again has not considered a proposal beyond a quick chat of the ‘old boys network’. A coalition made possible by reaching out to people who may not always agree with you on everything but will stand together on a key campaign.
I work with people from a diverse array of backgrounds and I
make no apology for that. The day a politician or group refuses to speak or
work with people based solely on whether they are from trade union,
association, organisation or resident forum, is a day you deserve to lose office.
No comments:
Post a Comment